Murder is the taking of
one person’s life by another. One of the Ten Commandments, the basic rules of
the Church, is ‘Thou shall not kill’. So the very essence of murder is wrong.
Even if you are not the mastermind behind the murder you are still in the wrong
if you kill a person under orders, even if your life is a stake. The only
murder I find at all justifiable is that of self-defense, not defense from an
organization or man, no I call that self-preservation. When I say self-defense
I mean killing someone who is threatening your life through violence at that
very moment, not some far away dictator. Non-action can be as disastrous as
outright murder as well. While some may argue Victor Capesius is the more evil
of the two Germans in the article because of his outright cruelty and
nonresistance to the Nazi murdering of Jews Konrad Jarausch is as guilty of
murder as Capesius is. Jarausch said he opposed the Nazi regime, yet he did
nothing to stop it or help it. Others risked their lives because they believed
Hitler was wrong. Jarausch did not, and he even worked in the reserve German
military and was in charge of POW camps for the captured Russians. He could
have made a difference, could have saved even a few lives, but he just watched
and did nothing. In Macbeth those who
carry out Macbeth’s orders are as much to blame for the murders as Macbeth himself
is. Any excuse involving “I was just following orders” doesn’t cut it. They
killed people, perhaps not innocent people but still people. They were not
forced to do this at gunpoint or ‘spear point’ as the case may be, but of their
own (mostly) free will. Following one’s leaders should not involve doing
immoral things just because one is told to do them. The men Macbeth sent as
murders did this job, maybe not because they personally wanted the victims
dead, but because they wanted to
serve their king. Free choice is still involved. Protesting orders, in both scenarios,
and helping to save those hunted would keep you in god moral standing, but
could endanger your life. I guess it’s just comes down to whats more important
to a person, morals or staying alive. Knowing you did something as horrible as
killing someone might not be preferable to a death in which you know you did
the right thing. Killing is never right, regardless of the circumstances of the
murder; it can be justified, but never made moral or right. And once the deed
is done, there is no turning back the hands of time.
Hi Anna,
ReplyDeleteNice response to the writing prompt. I enjoyed your no nonsense and religiously justified argument. With acts as atrocious as murder, there is an appropriately clear mandate against them. I appreciated your claim that both the agents and passive bystanders are guilty when it comes to murder. You did well to connect the article to our reading of "Macbeth." Good job.